Guides
Referrals are usually the best source by quality and cost, and most programmes still fizzle. The difference is making it dead simple to refer and visibly fair to get rewarded.

Key takeaways
Eligible roles, reward amount, and a split payout with probation.
Shareable links, drop-a-name path, no forms.
Attribute each referral to its referrer in the pipeline.
Prompt payout when rules are met; thank people out loud.
Referred candidates consistently come out ahead: they're pre-vetted by someone who knows both the person and the job, they tend to stay longer, and they cost a fraction of a paid channel because they skip the expensive top of the funnel. That advantage comes from the referrer's judgement, so the worst thing you can do is pressure people into referring anyone just to hit a number. Protect quality over volume; a few good referrals beat a flood of obligatory ones.
Watch the bias risk
Referrals tend to clone the existing team, which can quietly narrow diversity over time. Keep referral hires inside the same structured, fair process as everyone else, and don't let "a friend vouched for them" skip the steps that keep hiring objective and AGG-compliant.
Decide and publish the specifics before launch: which roles qualify, the reward amount (often tiered by role seniority or hard-to-fill-ness), and crucially WHEN it pays, typically a split, part on hire and part after the new person passes probation, which both rewards the referral and discourages referring people who won't last. Write it down so there's no "I thought I'd get more" later. Ambiguity is what quietly kills trust in these programmes.
This is where most programmes die. If referring means filling a form, attaching a CV and emailing HR, almost nobody does it past the first week. Lower the friction to near zero: a shareable job link, a simple "refer someone" path, the ability to just drop a name and let recruiting follow up. The easier you make the moment someone thinks "oh, my friend would be great for this", the more referrals you get. Friction, not lack of goodwill, is the usual killer.
Tag referred applications by their referrer so you can see the source, move them through the same fair process as everyone else, and pay out promptly and publicly when the rules are met. Nothing fuels a referral programme like a colleague visibly getting their reward, and nothing kills one like a payout that's late or disputed. In KI BMS a referred candidate carries its source from the start, so attributing the hire and triggering the reward is part of the normal pipeline, not a separate manual reconciliation. Track it, pay it fast, and say thank you out loud.
FAQ
Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. You can export and delete everything self-serve.

Written by
Co-Founder + CEO
Julia is one of the Co-Founders. She handles design, product direction, and most of the support replies that arrive in the morning.
Read next
How to build and maintain a talent pool instead of starting every role from zero
Turn near-miss candidates into a warm shortlist for your next opening.
Read
The phone screen: a 15-minute guide that saves you hours of interviews
A short structured first call that filters before the expensive interviews.
Read
The intake meeting: how recruiting and the hiring manager actually agree on the role
Align recruiter and hiring manager before sourcing, not after the misses.
Read