Compare

KI BMS: the GDPR-friendly alternative to Kenjo

Plain-language privacy notice, standard German GDPR DPA available on request, self-serve export + delete.

GDPR alternative
ATS
Comparison
HR suite
Julia Yukovich
Julia YukovichCo-Founder + CEO
·April 19, 2026·
3 min read

GDPR isn't a checkbox - it's a posture. If you're moving off Kenjo because their AVV / DPA is opaque, KI BMS is what a clean alternative looks like: subprocessor list of two (Stripe + mail relay), self-serve export + delete from account settings, and a standard German GDPR DPA on request when your procurement team needs one.

At a glance

Kenjo is a fair pick when you want a lean all-in-one HR suite: personnel files, time tracking, shift planning, documents, reporting - and recruiting as an add-on module. The recruiting module is solid (careers page, many job-board connections, LinkedIn import, application phases, scorecards). For a team primarily digitalising HR admin, Kenjo is hard to beat. KI BMS is right when recruiting is the bottleneck and you want KI pre-sort with per-application reasoning as a default - not as another tab in an HR suite. Both host in the EU. If you need both, it's often cheap to run Kenjo for HR and KI BMS for recruiting side by side.

GDPR posture

GDPR is a posture, not a checkbox

Three things matter under GDPR for a tool like this: (1) lawful basis for processing, (2) data subject rights (export, delete, port), and (3) the auftragsverarbeitungs­vertrag / DPA chain. KI BMS treats them as engineering invariants, not legal optics. Lawful basis is the contract you sign with us. Subject rights are self-serve from your account settings - no support ticket required. The subprocessor list has two entries (Stripe + mail relay). A standard German GDPR DPA is available on request from /sales whenever your procurement team needs one - we don't charge for it and don't gate it behind a plan tier. Where Kenjo sits on each of these is the rest of this page.

KI BMS vs Kenjo: GDPR comparison

When to pick which

Pick KI BMS when

Recruiting is your bottleneck - 5+ open roles or 100+ applications per quarter someone has to read.
You want KI pre-sort with per-application reasoning as a default, not just manual scorecards.
You already have an HR suite (Kenjo, Personio, DATEV) and just need a better, deeper ATS alongside.
GDPR retention with auto-anonymisation as a built-in switch matters to you, not as a manual task.

Pick Kenjo when

Your first bottleneck is HR admin - files, time tracking, shift planning, absence, not recruiting.
You want multi-job-board posting and LinkedIn import directly from the HR software.
A single suite for everything is organisationally easier to procure than two specialists.
Your recruiting volume is low (1-4 roles a year) and the module is entirely sufficient.

GDPR questions

What customer data-protection teams typically ask before signing a DPA.

Start with KI BMS

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Julia Yukovich

Written by

Julia Yukovich

Co-Founder + CEO

Julia is one of the Co-Founders. She handles design, product direction, and most of the support replies that arrive in the morning.

julia.yukovich at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn