Compare
Plain-language privacy notice, standard German GDPR DPA available on request, self-serve export + delete.

GDPR isn't a checkbox - it's a posture. If you're moving off eRecruiter because their AVV / DPA is opaque, KI BMS is what a clean alternative looks like: subprocessor list of two (Stripe + mail relay), self-serve export + delete from account settings, and a standard German GDPR DPA on request when your procurement team needs one.
eRecruiter is right when you want an established, mature DACH applicant management that has existed since 2001, that you can run as cloud or on-premise, and that can evaluate over 100 recruiting KPIs. For larger recruiting departments with their own reporting ambitions, and for organisations that need on-premise for regulatory reasons, that's a strong argument. KI BMS is right for modern teams up to 100 staff that want KI pre-sort with reasoning as a default, want to be productive in hours not weeks, and prefer public, monthly-cancellable prices. Both are DACH-centric and take GDPR seriously - they target different generations of buyers.
GDPR posture
Three things matter under GDPR for a tool like this: (1) lawful basis for processing, (2) data subject rights (export, delete, port), and (3) the auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag / DPA chain. KI BMS treats them as engineering invariants, not legal optics. Lawful basis is the contract you sign with us. Subject rights are self-serve from your account settings - no support ticket required. The subprocessor list has two entries (Stripe + mail relay). A standard German GDPR DPA is available on request from /sales whenever your procurement team needs one - we don't charge for it and don't gate it behind a plan tier. Where eRecruiter sits on each of these is the rest of this page.
GDPR questions
Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.
Read next
Full KI BMS vs eRecruiter
Established DACH ATS with on-premise option and deep reporting vs lean KI ATS. When each generation pays off.
Read
KI BMS vs concludis: established German e-recruiting vs modern specialist
Established German e-recruiting with multi-posting vs modern KI-default tool. Procurement vs self-serve.
Read
KI BMS vs Prescreen: Austrian ATS in the onlyfy group vs lean specialist
Established DACH ATS in the XING / onlyfy group vs lean KI-default tool with public pricing.
Read
KI BMS vs Onlyfy by XING: network-driven vs KI-driven
Onlyfy has the XING network as a source. KI BMS has KI as a tool. Comparison for DACH recruiting teams.
Read
| Ours KI BMS | Theirs eRecruiter | |
|---|---|---|
GDPR auto-anonymisation | GDPR-strong, details quote-dependent | |
On-premise deployment possible | ||
Reporting depth (recruiting KPIs) | Core metrics | 100+ KPIs |
KI fit-score with reasoning | Not publicly stated | |
Careers portal + CV parsing | ||
XING / LinkedIn import | ||
Structured interviews + scorecards | ||
Hosted in Germany | DACH (cloud) or your house (on-prem) | |
Free tier | 14-day trial | |
Setup time | Hours | Weeks with setup |
Pricing model | Public (€0 / €1 / €10 per month) | Quote-based |
Minimum term | None - monthly | Contractual, usually annual |