Compare
What moving from Factorial to KI BMS actually looks like in 2026.

KI BMS is what people use when Factorial stops fitting. Below is the honest side-by-side - same product surface, different posture: hosted in Germany, no third-party trackers, one honest price - plus the migration mechanics that decide whether the switch lands in an evening or in a quarter.
Factorial is a strong pick if you want an HR platform for all personnel admin - time tracking, absence, documents, payroll handoff and a recruiting module on top. For 20-200-person companies without dedicated HR software, that's a sensible consolidation. KI BMS is right when recruiting is your bottleneck and you want KI pre-sort with reasoning, a real pipeline and a German careers page instead of a platform's generalist recruiting tab. The most common 2026 architecture: Factorial for HR admin, KI BMS for recruiting in parallel.
Switching
The switch goes in three rough phases: export from Factorial, import into KI BMS, and reorganise what came over. Most people allocate an evening for it. The export side is where the time goes - Factorial hands you a CSV/JSON dump and the field mapping isn't always obvious; once that's resolved the import is a couple of minutes. We don't paywall the import path or pretend it's a pro-only feature, and you can run both side-by-side while you decide.
Factorial is one of the most convincing all-in-one HR platforms for small and mid-sized companies starting from scratch. Time tracking, leave requests, sick notes, document storage, payroll handoff, org chart - all in one place, with a modern UI that doesn't look like admin software from 2008. If you have no HR software and want to build it, Factorial is an honestly good foundation.
The recruiting module is solid for the basics: create a role, receive applications, set status, send mail. That covers a big part of recruiting reality, especially at low volume. What it doesn't deliver is depth exactly where recruiting becomes a bottleneck.
A generalist recruiting module typically lacks three things. One - KI pre-sort with readable, correctable per-application reasoning. Two - structured multi-voice scorecards forcing several interviewers onto the same criteria axis. Three - per-candidate GDPR retention with auto-anonymisation as a default rather than homework. At 1-4 roles a year, none of this shows. At 5+ open roles simultaneously, each of these three becomes a daily friction loss.
Many teams using KI BMS for recruiting run Factorial or Personio or HeavenHR alongside for HR admin. The tools don't need much integration: on hire, the person is created fresh in the platform, the application record stays in the KI BMS archive with audit log and retention window. Nobody misses deep integration; the clean separation between application funnel and personnel file is exactly what makes the architecture work - and it keeps costs low.
Find the export option in Factorial's account settings. Most tools provide a CSV or JSON download. Save the dump locally - that's the source of truth for the next step.
Open the import tool in KI BMS. Factorial's field names rarely match KI BMS' 1:1; the import flags any unmapped columns so you can pair them up before anything commits.
Run the import. KI BMS shows a preview of the first parsed rows in the import dialog so you can sanity-check the column mapping + a sample of records before anything commits. If you're nervous about a large dump, import a small subset first, verify it landed the way you expected, then run the full file.
Factorial-specific UI metadata (custom views, saved filters, in-app annotations) doesn't transfer with the data export. Spend an evening rebuilding the views you used most - usually a 30-minute job once you've done it once.
Run both side-by-side for a couple of weeks if you want to be sure. When you're confident, cancel the Factorial subscription from their side. KI BMS keeps your export option self-serve in account settings - no lock-in either direction.
Switching from Factorial
Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by
Co-Founder + CEO
Julia is one of the Co-Founders. She handles design, product direction, and most of the support replies that arrive in the morning.
Read next
Full KI BMS vs Factorial
Broad HR platform with a recruiting module vs dedicated ATS. Decision grid for 20-200-person companies.
Read
KI BMS vs rexx HR: heavy suite vs lean specialist
rexx HR covers the full HR spectrum + ATS in a suite. KI BMS is recruiting only - but faster and with KI from day 1.
Read
KI BMS vs Kenjo: all-in-one HR suite or recruiting specialist?
All-in-one HR with recruiting add-on vs dedicated KI ATS - decision grid for 10-80-person teams.
Read
KI BMS vs Personio: the right recruiting tool for modern HR teams
Suite vs specialist: when an integrated HR tool wins - and when a dedicated ATS sets you free.
Read
| Ours KI BMS | Theirs Factorial | |
|---|---|---|
Time tracking + absence | ||
Documents + payroll handoff | ||
Recruiting module | Specialist | Module |
KI fit-score with reasoning | KI features present, recruiting depth limited | |
Multi-voice scorecards | Limited | |
Careers page included | Basic page | |
GDPR auto-anonymisation | Manual | |
Hosted in Germany | EU hosting | |
Starting price | €0 / €1 / €10 per month | Per employee, module-dependent |
Contract model | Monthly cancellation | Annual contract typical |