Can Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor use KI BMS directly?

Yes, via the MCP server. It's a stdio JSON-RPC server that wires into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-aware client in five lines of config. The list of tools matches your data model 1:1 - whatever a CRUD type exposes in the UI is exposed identically to the agent.

Do agent calls share the same auth + access controls?

Yes. The MCP server authenticates with the same JWT or PAT a human session uses. Sharing rules, org membership, rate limits, suspicion bans - all of it applies. There's no "agent backdoor" that bypasses the access matrix.

Is there an audit trail for agent actions?

Yes. Every mutation goes through the same audit-log path as a UI click. The transport (UI / API / CLI / MCP) is recorded as channel metadata so you can filter "what did the agent do this hour" from your account history.

Can I rate-limit an agent separately from a human?

Per-token rate limits apply, so you can issue an agent its own PAT and cap it independently. The shared user-level bucket also caps total throughput, so a runaway loop can't drain your whole account. The CLI's auto-update channel marker means you can also see in audit which version is calling.

Does the MCP / API surface cost extra?

No. Same plan, same surface. We don't paywall the agent - it's the same product, the same schema, the same access gates. If a plan can do X in the UI, it can do X via MCP.

KI BMS

Pricing

Compare

KI BMS: the agent-friendly alternative to eRecruiter

Same product, same surface for humans and AI agents. MCP server + CLI + drop-in clients in 15 languages.

Agentic alternative

ATS

Comparison

DACH

Finn GlasCo-Founder + Engineering

·February 9, 2026·

3 min read

KI BMS ships an MCP server you can wire into Claude Desktop or any MCP client in five lines. The same auth + access gates apply, the same audit log records every action, the same rate limits apply. eRecruiter doesn't currently expose this surface - that's the gap.

At a glance

eRecruiter is right when you want an established, mature DACH applicant management that has existed since 2001, that you can run as cloud or on-premise, and that can evaluate over 100 recruiting KPIs. For larger recruiting departments with their own reporting ambitions, and for organisations that need on-premise for regulatory reasons, that's a strong argument. KI BMS is right for modern teams up to 100 staff that want KI pre-sort with reasoning as a default, want to be productive in hours not weeks, and prefer public, monthly-cancellable prices. Both are DACH-centric and take GDPR seriously - they target different generations of buyers.

Agent surface

What 'agent-friendly' actually means in practice

KI BMS ships an MCP server, a CLI, and drop-in clients in 15 languages. They're auto-generated from the same schema your UI uses; the auth, the access gates, the rate limits, the audit log all apply identically whether you're clicking buttons or calling the API. eRecruiter doesn't currently expose this surface, which is the gap a serious agent integration trips over - the agent ends up scraping the UI through a browser, which is fragile, slow, and silently bypasses everything below.

KI BMS vs eRecruiter: agent-readiness comparison

	Ours KI BMS	Theirs eRecruiter
On-premise deployment possible
Reporting depth (recruiting KPIs)	Core metrics	100+ KPIs
KI fit-score with reasoning		Not publicly stated
Careers portal + CV parsing
XING / LinkedIn import
Structured interviews + scorecards
GDPR auto-anonymisation		GDPR-strong, details quote-dependent
Hosted in Germany		DACH (cloud) or your house (on-prem)
Free tier		14-day trial
Setup time	Hours	Weeks with setup
Pricing model	Public (€0 / €1 / €10 per month)	Quote-based
Minimum term	None - monthly	Contractual, usually annual

When to pick which

Pick KI BMS when

You're up to 100 staff and want KI pre-sort with reasoning as a default, not a later add-on.

You want to be productive in hours not weeks - free tier, self-serve, no setup project.

Public prices and monthly cancellation matter more to you than 100-KPI reporting.

Cloud is enough for you - you don't need on-premise in your own data centre.

Pick eRecruiter when

You need on-premise in your own data centre for regulatory or corporate reasons.

Your recruiting reporting is demanding - you regularly evaluate many KPIs against each other.

A long, stable market presence since 2001 is concrete trust value in procurement.

You want XING/LinkedIn import and a fully CI-customised careers portal from one source.

Agentic-integration questions

What an agent-builder asks before wiring a tool into Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor.

Start with KI BMS

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by

Finn Glas

Co-Founder + Engineering

Finn is one of the Co-Founders. He owns the engineering side, the infrastructure, and most of the late-night fixes that ship before anyone notices.

finn.glas at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn Website